<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Won&#8217;t you join my wiki?</title>
	<link>http://www.marthaburtis.net/wrapping/2005/10/05/wont-you-join-my-wiki/</link>
	<description>tales of swimming upstream</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 10:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://www.marthaburtis.net/wrapping/2005/10/05/wont-you-join-my-wiki/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 19:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marthaburtis.net/wrapping/2005/10/05/wont-you-join-my-wiki/#comment-92</guid>
		<description>Chris,

As I responded to your previous comment about this (see earlier post), the open-source nature of SynchroEdit is enticing, but since the product is only available in alpha right now, these other possibilities are more appealing contenders at the moment. 

I'm looking forward to using SynchroEdit in all it's open-source glory---when it's available. . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>As I responded to your previous comment about this (see earlier post), the open-source nature of SynchroEdit is enticing, but since the product is only available in alpha right now, these other possibilities are more appealing contenders at the moment. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to using SynchroEdit in all it&#8217;s open-source glory&#8212;when it&#8217;s available. . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Allen</title>
		<link>http://www.marthaburtis.net/wrapping/2005/10/05/wont-you-join-my-wiki/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Allen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 19:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marthaburtis.net/wrapping/2005/10/05/wont-you-join-my-wiki/#comment-91</guid>
		<description>As I commented on Om's blog, one key point that people seem to be missing about SynchroEdit is that it is an open source project. This means that we are making available the source code, and publishing the protocol, so that this capability can be added to any web service or application.

Thus comparisons to JotLive and Writely are somewhat orthagonal. They are web services. If they wanted to, there is no reason why they couldn't implement our source code as part of their product.

The goal of SynchroEdit is to offer the capabilitity of synchronous editing as broadly as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I commented on Om&#8217;s blog, one key point that people seem to be missing about SynchroEdit is that it is an open source project. This means that we are making available the source code, and publishing the protocol, so that this capability can be added to any web service or application.</p>
<p>Thus comparisons to JotLive and Writely are somewhat orthagonal. They are web services. If they wanted to, there is no reason why they couldn&#8217;t implement our source code as part of their product.</p>
<p>The goal of SynchroEdit is to offer the capabilitity of synchronous editing as broadly as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
